Line In Audio. it SHOULD be better
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2022 11:38 pm
Hi, this is the problem. When the audio is inserted into LINE IN (with cable) it is not known what bpm the controller is working at.
For example, if I go into COLOR FX the BPM of the BPM TAP is shown (an ABSURD thing! It is absurd there is no other word to define it).
For a product that wants to be defined PROFESSIONAL (also considering the price) when I select an audio source, the BMP shown on the screen MUST be relative to the selected audio source (bpm tap / line in / integrated mic).
Now this is a TOTALLY software problem (and therefore can be updated and fixed) because if one of the controller's functions is to have bpm via line in then somewhere a firmware function "scans" the audio and will produce a bpm of result. why not show it? Rather at this point HIDE the bpm text or write us something like "LINE IN" "INTERNAL MIC" but it is absolutely unprofessional to show a wrong BPM (yes because it is INCOERENT with the selected source).
Also another problem is the saturation of the signal.
This product is advertised and sold as a product also aimed at ITINERANT DJs to use it live.
Well ... from a console you go out either with the master or with the booth or with the rec. in all these cases the sound has an output volume. in any case (not knowing the bpm) we djs don't know how the controller is working (good? bad? okay? maybe it doesn't work?) and we tested that if the volume is too low or too high the controller literally goes into chaos .
In the settings could we have a graph (classic horizontal bar from green to red) for the volume of the input level (and this is also something that is programmed at the SW level and not from the HW) ???
Well ... the second problem is a "normal" problem but the first problem .. not knowing if the controller has a synchronous bpm to that of the track is really shameful for a 700 euro controller.
For example, if I go into COLOR FX the BPM of the BPM TAP is shown (an ABSURD thing! It is absurd there is no other word to define it).
For a product that wants to be defined PROFESSIONAL (also considering the price) when I select an audio source, the BMP shown on the screen MUST be relative to the selected audio source (bpm tap / line in / integrated mic).
Now this is a TOTALLY software problem (and therefore can be updated and fixed) because if one of the controller's functions is to have bpm via line in then somewhere a firmware function "scans" the audio and will produce a bpm of result. why not show it? Rather at this point HIDE the bpm text or write us something like "LINE IN" "INTERNAL MIC" but it is absolutely unprofessional to show a wrong BPM (yes because it is INCOERENT with the selected source).
Also another problem is the saturation of the signal.
This product is advertised and sold as a product also aimed at ITINERANT DJs to use it live.
Well ... from a console you go out either with the master or with the booth or with the rec. in all these cases the sound has an output volume. in any case (not knowing the bpm) we djs don't know how the controller is working (good? bad? okay? maybe it doesn't work?) and we tested that if the volume is too low or too high the controller literally goes into chaos .
In the settings could we have a graph (classic horizontal bar from green to red) for the volume of the input level (and this is also something that is programmed at the SW level and not from the HW) ???
Well ... the second problem is a "normal" problem but the first problem .. not knowing if the controller has a synchronous bpm to that of the track is really shameful for a 700 euro controller.